My mind is quite blank today and I have no
literal idea how I should express my opinion of Shakespeare’s plays. I mean
there are two main things that I find myself completely and utterly fascinated
by. Number one – That there are multiple theories about Shakespeare’s work and
that he may not be the honest author of his plays. Number two- He had a strong
ability to analyse the society. This being exhibited in a number of his plays.
Lets start with number one. Yes I do
realise, in my previous blog, I completely bad mouthed Shakespeare and his role
in Elizabethan theatre, but hey, that isn’t entirely my fault, I guess I didn’t
find myself drawn in to Elizabethan theatre. I wont deny, yes, it may be an
interesting time for some, but as you could see, it wasn’t oh-so-amazing at
all. EVERYONE knows Shakespeare’s plays from small primary children to the
elderly. He’s one of the most famous and legendary English playwrights in the
history of literature. He is the epitome of all things literature.
There have been many conspiracy theories
that state that Shakespeare wasn’t the author of his plays, although this might
be true as he didn’t have a proper education and still, little is known about
him, in my opinion I believe that Shakespeare was the true author of his playwrights
and poems. Honestly, if it weren’t
Shakespeare who wrote the plays, why would he be so famous to this day and age?
And why would high school students be forced to study a range of his famous
plays, like Hamlet, Romeo and Juliet or even Macbeth? People have the audacity to believe that
because Shakespeare didn’t receive a University degree and that he endured a
lack of education, that he couldn’t have the ability to write all his world
famous plays. Well, what do my fellow bloggers think? Do you believe that you
need to have a University degree to be an accredited writer? There are multiple
people who have a University degree and haven’t even attempted to write a story
and to think that Shakespeare wasn’t the true writer of his OWN work. I won’t
deny, the way that Shakespeare wrote his plays perplexes me, and I find it
quite perculiar, but I mean the way he wrote described exactly how society was
divided during his lifetime, and yes, I find most of his work quite boring and
vain. However during his lifetime people could relate to his plays because –
1.
The poor were striving for
attention (well at least I think so anyway).
2.
There was a strict hierarchy
implemented.
3.
Women were viewed as superior
to men, however in Shakespeare’s plays, women had respected roles, and this
exhibits exactly how women wanted to be viewed.
Therefore, I believe that although his work
may seem completely and utterly boring, the old English society found
themselves entertained by his plays and this is why, William Shakespeare, is
still famous for his work today.
Let me continue with my second fascination.
My fellow bloggers, I shall save you the trouble of having to go back to the
top to remember my second fascination by just telling you. “Shakespeare had a
refined ability to analyse society”, as I mentioned above women were viewed as
subservient to men during Shakespeare’s lifetime. In his plays however, Macbeth
as an example, the main source of power and persuasiveness comes from Lady
Macbeth. Lady Macbeth persuades Macbeth to commit all the evil deeds and this
is due to the fact that she had a certain ambition to become Queen and have all
the power. This exhibits how women during this time period strived for power.
The murderers in Macbeth are also another example of how the less fortunate
were viewed. In one of the acts when Macbeth sends the two murderers to murder
Banquo, the murderers obey him straight away although they know that Banquo was
a dear friend of Macbeth.
To conclude, yes, I do not deny that
Shakespeare’s plays are vain and boring, however he observed the society
carefully and incorporated his observations in his plays in order for his
audience to be able to relate to his plays. And I also find it quite absurd,
that people have the audacity to doubt one of the worlds most famous playwrights
work.

.jpeg)
I really liked your style of writing here. I think you've started to share your opinion more, and more clearly. That's a great thing! I like how you've used Macbeth as an example of how Shakespeare wrote about society in those days. To me, it made sense and I clearly understood what you though about this topic. However, I think it would've appealed more to me if it was a bit more informal, it would've been a bit more interesting, but don't get me wrong, I LOVED IT! GOOD JOB ALINE :D
ReplyDeleteI loved your blog post, it was beautifully written! The examples you mentioned helped create a clear image of the argument you carried on. Excellent job!x
ReplyDeleteA good entry Aline - lots of interesting information! The only feedback I would give you is to change up your font style, size and colour to break up different pieces of information and make it stand out a little more!
ReplyDelete